A Letter to the 9/11 Conspiracy Seekers ("Truthers")
These notes attempt to rebuff
the 9/11 conspiracy theories in a brief no-nonsense form, without analyzing
grainy pictures or too many questionable facts. Is it possible to be brief in
such a highly noisy informational field flooded with low level details (true or
false) and various speculations? Attempts to examine each and every of them
would inevitably inflate this document, diminishing the chances that readers
follow it and think it through.
In general, it is near
impossible to prove anything beyond one's direct and immediate perception
to individuals preprocessed in a certain school of (mis-)education. Why?
Because the raw information and misinformation abound, yet it is very difficult
to set any formal rules how to sort it out - unless one is deeply proficient in
the respective hard science. That is why things like "Holocaust
denial", the "No Moon landing", or the "9/11 internal
job" "theories" are so persistent in certain social strata.
The "9/11 internal
job" list of claims is not one and the same for all believers. Here I am
trying to rebuff only the most wild of them. Some statements of the government
report on the 9/11 may and must be reasonably doubted. There are things which the
government did hide about the 9/11/2001, just as it did on say Oklahoma bombing. The
government definitely hid the depth of Islamic inroads into the US power
structures, and also numerous cases of grotesque negligence which made this
tragedy possible. Here I am analyzing only wildest of the "truthers" claims.
Instead of examining numerous
questionable direct facts or speculations flooding the Internet, I am
going to consider rather indirect effects of a higher level, all being self
Like in criminal justice,
when confronting a scene of a terrible crime, in order to prosecute and indict
a culprit, not only do you have to demonstrate direct links between the culprit
and the crime. You must also produce a credible explanation of his motives
and goals: especially in a situation with scarce direct evidence.
9/11 tragedy was definitely not a "flag operation" for
triggering anything like an all-out war or global military campaign
against Islamic world. Why? Because no all-out war against
Islamic world has yet happened. (The after 9/11 several months delayed
campaign in Afghanistan with limited conventional forces does not count). Alas:
On 9/12/2001 Mecca and Medina were not nuked! Moslems in the US were not
rounded up! No mosques were burnt down on 9/12 anywhere in the US! On the
contrary: the US dhimmy-government took all measures to protect mosques!!!
And it is getting only worse: in fact, Islamization of America advances in
leap and bounds. Thus you have a "flag" of cosmic proportion,
yet no subsequent operation matching the "flag". The 9/11 was
actually the opposite of what the euphemism "flag
operation" stands for, being in fact an "appeasement flag".
Unlike say the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor in 1941, utilized by the
American government as a trigger to engage the sleeping country in an
all-out war, the 9/11 tragedy only embarrassed the US government not
wishing to acknowledge a state of war with Islam at all. (The US
government did wish however to whitewash itself and cover up its
negligence in dealing with several warnings about the threat of 9/11 from
various intelligence sources).
blame the US government for orchestrating the 9/11 automatically means to
absolve Islam and to completely exclude Islam from the equation. It
means refusal to see that Islam in the US has already overpowered
Christianity, that Christianity is expelled while Islam has a green light.
That Islam controls the universities and schools, has penetrated into all
layers of government – up to enthroning a Moslem impostor Obama as a
US President. It means refusal to see tones of evidences that Islam
has been at war against the rest of the world for millennia. That in the
20th century Islam was tremendously empowered by the oil money, reactivating
its war on the
West by all means. There were numerous Islamic attacks before the 9/11
and after it such as those in Madrid, London, Moscow, Beslan, Bali,
Bombay, and just this recent one in Fort Hood – to name a few. It is
preposterous to single out the 9/11 out of this line for some twisted
reasons. One of motives of singling out the 9/11 is a deliberate
attempt to whitewash Islam and to blame Neo-Cons (read "Jews")
it were a criminal government plot of such a scale, the intelligence of
other countries would figure it out, and the internal opponents of
Bush and of his government would figure it out too. There is no
significant state in the entire world (except Iran) –
friendly, unfriendly, hostile, secular, or Islamic – which dares to claim
anything else but the official explanation of the 9/11. Not one
significant media source – all left-wing and anti-American! Bush haters in
the Congress and a lot of other politicians have been looking for every
thing imaginable to impeach Bush: how could they possibly not use this
trump card?!! All those hysterical Obamamaniacs: why didn't they bring
this issue fore?
the crime goal were to simulate Islamic attack on the high profile American
targets, it would have been enough that the planes hit the buildings –
even if the buildings remained standing. There would be absolutely no
point for controlled demolition later of anything on the scene at all.
the goal were that the billionaire-owner of the properties collects the
insurance in an arranged catastrophe, which sense does it make for him
to engage the government in such an extremely complex implementation with
4 planes targeting also not his properties (such as Pentagon).
the government (for whichever reason) planned such an unprecedented
mega-flag operation: which sense would it make to combine the plot with
criminal aspirations of some billionaire? To compromise the secrecy
for such a minute reason?
the goal were to destroy some compromising documentation stored in
Building 7, much more plausible scenarios could be developed: No need
in multiple plane attacks. Why to set this spectacle with controlled
demolition of Building 7, never hit by Islamic skyjackers nor having any
victims inside? To impress whom? Not only is Building 7 redundant in this
scheme of things, but worse: betraying the "hidden" (demolition)
technique and giving a useful hint to all the "truth seekers"...
to keep the top secrecy when leaks are happening all the time, and
the operation like this would require hundreds of top secret executives of
reason it may be that the government supposedly orchestrated this
conspiracy, it must have been worth it to them to cause so much suffering
and loss of life. So if there is any truth to this, the government
wouldn't let a couple of pecker-neck chumps to produce films, nor
thousands others to promote them and "disseminate the truth". What are
a few more lives of these trouble-makers to them to ensure the success of
considering physical systems of a complexity such as scenes of the 9/11
tragedy, the truth seekers demonstrate enviable willingness to apply
physics. Yet this willingness is hardly substantiated in the country,
where the Physics is taught as a one year optional high school course at
best. As a result, these critics are sincerely amazed that buildings
collapse, well, exactly vertically and almost in free fall.
- America has been the most advanced and the most benign (if
not intimidated!) benevolent superpower ever, the unique successful social
experiment, and the bright city on the hill. For anybody who traveled and
learned other countries and their history, this must be an obvious fact.
To assume that the US government implemented the mega plot of a
viciousness never known in the history with no observable goal – requires
a sick mind of the kind predicted
It is one thing to realize
that the US government during Clinton, Bush and now goes out of its skin to
deny that Islam is at war against America (and the rest of the world). Such a
denial was suicidal and criminal indeed because it involved suppression of the
precious intelligence which could prevent the 9/11, and it cultivated dhimmitude
at all levels. It was criminal as well to hide islamic traces in the Oklahoma
bombing and of a few other suspicious plane crashes. And more generally, it was
criminal indeed to open America for islamic immigration decades ago and to keep
Yet it is quite different (and ugly) thing to
blame the US government in orchestration of the 9/11.
The US government is guilty in denial of the war which Islam is waging on us.
The "9/11 truthers" are in such denial too.